The phenomenon of elderly
people fixed with rapt and adoring attention on The Lawrence Welk
Show used to totally baffle me. Everything about it seemed
transparently fake - fake smiles, fake dialogue, fake music. The
bubbles might have been real. It was like the glaring opposite of
hip. But hip can be fake too, more like the opposite of authentic, or
maybe anti-real. It’s not much of a leap from Lawrence Welk to
Ronald Reagan.
My sister dragged me to a
church dinner program once while visiting her in California. It was
like being in the Lawrence Welk audience; corny and lame humor with
everyone laughing politely as if what was said symbolized
humor and the laughter symbolized rather than was actual
amusement. Sort of like a high end car can represent status rather
than a good car. I thought, these are the kind of folks who believe
Ronald Reagan was heroic and actually voted for the guy, later
approving naming airports and freeways after him, and today going on
about how they miss him – if only he were around, the country’d
shape up fast. I almost said “sincerely” voted for the guy. I
suppose if you believe something, however deluded, you are “sincere”
when you act out of those convictions. This is what the 60s
intuitively rejected as some of us began to shake off our slumber.
But Welk fans were there too so it was only a segment of the
population who embraced criticality. And, unfortunately, it’s not a
generational thing. We can’t expect superficiality to fade with the
passage of time for it seems to dwell among us and to replenish
itself.
I’m not sure how large
the Lawrence Welk audience was. Nixon liked to pretend they were the
“silent majority”. The election of he and Reagan, and Bush for
that matter (both of’em), suggests he wasn’t far wrong. In any
event, they represent a huge problem for any politician with a
progressive agenda. They constitute a large body of theoretically
easily manipulable, and easily alienated voters. All bolstered of
course by a compliant, hell, complicit media.
A strange incongruity to
the picture I’m painting here is that polls show a majority of the
population supports diplomacy over war, single-payer healthcare over
insurance company tyranny, environmental health over corporate
profits. Yet the corporate stranglehold on our political system
doesn’t allow candidates with these priorities to flourish. Several
factors come into play: candidates need contributions to run their
campaigns; and short-term shifts in attitudes can be manipulated by
mis-information efforts – witness the recent defeat of GMO labeling
initiatives in California and Washington. Polls showed the labeling
campaign favored until Big Money turned it around. There’s also the
political strategy of saying what your pollsters determine your
audience wants to hear. And the establishment pressure on elected
officials to do their bidding and to mask it, in patriotic rhetoric
or whatever works this week.
One of the things that
seems to work over and over is to associate some virtue, flag or
Jesus for example, with the desired candidate or platform. Or to the
negative, distracting voters with actually irrelevant, to them, but
hot-wire issues like gay marriage or abortion, getting them to
unknowingly vote against their own real economic and personal liberty
interests.
During Bush the Younger’s administration polls showed that people believed W embraced certain values - environmental concern, violence only as last resort, standing up for the little guy etc; values that he quite obviously did not actually give two toots for.
Given this unstable
demographic there is always the danger that some master manipulator
will come along who can exploit it and sweep us all, once again, into
the furnace of world-wide war – this time with the “firepower”
to not come out of it. There is a hope, at least as likely (?) that
some gifted individual might find the language to touch the authentic
awareness that lies at the heart of every person not a sociopath, an
enlightened person of integrity who recognizes the necessity, if we
are to survive, for a shift in consciousness. Count on the sociopaths
to go after this person, should they appear, offering riches and
power that cannot be declined, or, turning to the Mafia creed that if
you can’t buy someone, you can murder them. Meanwhile the
sociopaths seem to be running things and ordinary citizens can lay
the ground for such a “revolution”, call it Democracy, by
resisting pathology and asserting for an environmentally sustainable,
peace and justice, alternative path.
No comments:
Post a Comment